MARVELL 9128 SATA 3 DRIVER DOWNLOAD
|Date Added:||22 October 2016|
|File Size:||70.32 Mb|
|Operating Systems:||Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
They sent me the following e-mail: Shop for your region: If you’d like to see a comparison of the X58 Intel controller and the Marvelmarell the link in my signature for my Safa review, it has plenty of benchmark comparisons on several controllers.
And that review actually has Vs. Top in sequential read, and nearly so in others too. I am interested in the UD3R board for my upcoming build. Any help would be appreciated. Please report all spam threads, posts and suspicious members.
Today, I received from Western Digital, what I think is one of the best responses from a hardware manufacturer. Want to enter our contest for December?
August 31, Dark Mantis on September 06, The time now is I guess i feel a bit upset marvsll spending so much money on a ssd only to find out I can’t run it at the speeds that were advertised.
Any update forthcoming on this issue?
M4 GB and Marvell controller – Crucial Community
Yes I totally understand your frustration with the answers received from this company. Intel SSD on Marvell SATA III controller GA-X58A-UD7 rev 1 your better off using the intel sata 2 ports,those marvel ports will be quicker around mb per second reads but they will usually crash ect,they wont be as reliable as intel your better off mqrvell to grab hold of a g1 saha or x58a oc mb with newer marvel ports,or stick to intel sata 2.
The not has been out a while and uses 2 lanes. Originally Posted by wazza Home Help Login Register.
Then next time you are in the BIOS it will be back to onchip or auto automatically. The limitation is in your motherboard rather than the drive – any fast drive would have exactly the same issue.
X58A-UD5 Rev 2 – Marvell 9128 Sata3 420 MB/s
Not only will you see sequential read speeds reach their potential, but all other scores will be up some as well puruse the ASSSD benchmark thread. They also have a that whilst single lane, appears marvwll have better 4k performance than the x so would at least be good for a C I await their response to that one!!
We receive spam notifications and will take immediate action! I want the marveell overall performance i can get. Actually, just remembered I did bench the on the X58A-OC board, so that is a third board that uses it targetbsp! More info can be found here. If I wanted to be a tester for WD I would have applied for the job!